WoW’s Major Flaw

The lack of posting recently is all because of World of Warcraft. Personal stuff has come up again and instead of me quitting WoW because of it, I actually restarted it as a means to save money. As much as I love my PS3, the games are expensive and renting two games equals more than a monthly fee in WoW.

However, and I was warned, thing have changed quite a bit since I left the game almost a year and a half ago. The first thing that was noticeable right off the bat is that complaining to Blizzard clearly works. Many of the things they said they wouldn’t do, they ended up doing. Some through a simple patch and some through an additional fee. Thankfully, I can now pay money to transfer my character to Alliance if I want to. Of course, I could just reroll a character … but what fun is that?

The major flaw that I notice is much on the user-side. I remember back with Vanilla WoW (as we call it), people would raid for – I dunno – fun. I have noticed since hitting 80 and getting myself geared that there are much more requirements to what you need to get into a raid or a raiding guild. And honestly, it’s very depressing.

The two things I should expect to do is to get myself to a decent gear so that I can start raiding and – obviously – be at the maximum level. But no more! Now, you have even more requirements that you have.

Gear Score. This really kinda’ bothers me. So now, not only do I have to be geared right … I have to have good enough gear that I break a certain number, which is generally 5,000. My character is at about 5300, and that’s with Icecrown Citadel (ICC) gear as well as the Tier 9 gear. What this means is that unless you aren’t already running ICC and don’t have your Tier 9 gear, you won’t be considered for a raid.

DPS. Apparently, DPS also needs to be at 5,000 or higher. This can prove to be a burden for some melee DPS just because in a fight of about five, your target can easily move out of range and you may not know it. Casters are okay because, for the most part, they stand there and use the same spells … and melee DPS basically does that too, but they need to pay attention to make sure their target is in range. The funniest is when casters who AoE complain about DPS. The catch with that is that casters who AoE are doing DPS on numerous characters and not just one character – like melee does. What this does is give them an unfair idea that their DPS is higher than what it actually is.

Achievement. This is – by far – the worst of them all. Achievements were brought into the game and are much like Trophies for the PS3. So when people want to see proof of achievements … what they’re saying is that you have to have done this before or else you won’t be considered.

Those are three points that weren’t around in Vanilla WoW. Back then, they actually looked via class alone … but now it’s class, Gear Score, DPS and even achievements. And I say … if that’s the case, then I’m sorry Blizzard, but I’m not investing money to jump through hoops to get into a simple raid. I’ve even thought that they should completely mask the DPS so nobody knows exactly how much people are doing and have Blizzard implement a system that will tell raid members if someone in the raid is undergeared/not ready. Because if Blizzard thinks you’re ready for a specific raid, then you should be. (Because with the new Dungeon Finder … if you’re not ready for a dungeon/raid, you can’t queue through their system)

Wake up people. Remember, this is a game … we’re supposed to have fun. Don’t have a damn application process just to do raids. It’s just ridiculous. If they’re geared for it and level 80 … then they’re good.

And on a related note, I absolutely love this video.

Uncharted 2 – The right way to do gaming?

I was shocked to find a copy of Uncharted 2 in the local Blockbuster. From the history of the first Uncharted, I was able to clear it pretty fast – so buying Uncharted 2 was a gamble since I may be done with it quickly.

Uncharted 2 was considered THE game to show the power of the PlayStation 3 and hopefully raise the bar to what other companies need to do to make a great game. Instead of a review of the game, I wanted to comment on this factor and whether or not it’s legit.

One thing I was amazed at throughout my playing is that the game looked great all around with no loading times, except for a longer-than-usual one at the beginning, and despite everything that was happening, the system kept up – no frame rate loss, no lag – the PS3 kept up with a game that was supposedly using the Cell Processor in the way that it was supposed to be used.

What really caught me though – was the presentation of the game. Naughty Dog did a phenomenal job at making the game fun to play and fun to watch. Cutscenes were legitimately funny thanks to the script of the characters back and forth. Not a fall-to-the-ground-laughing sort of thing but the way the dialogue was presented provided humor here and there.

Miscellaneous things such as Nathan Drake “playing” Marco-Polo while in a swimming pool (which is really ironic considering the game is based on a specific journey of Marco Polo) were one of the many miscellaneous things that showed me that the developers had fun with what they were doing. They also portrayed Nathan Drake as someone who had no problem being uneasy in the face of danger. He would react almost like WE would react in situations – unlike someone like Batman or Nathan Hale who seemingly has no fear.

Granted, Nathan has to be more daring than us, but when you see the “hero” of the game questioning why they’re doing what they’re doing before they jump – or, at one point say that they give up and that they’re finished with the whole ordeal – would be almost exactly what we would possibly do in the same situation.

Action sequences were done well too. Certain angles the camera would add to the overall feel of the game – and the levels that involved trains and jumping from vehicle-to-vehicle were also well done.

And this is why I really enjoyed Uncharted 2 – not because it’s properly using the Cell Processor or because it’s a hyped up game … but because the game’s presentation was so well done in my opinion. I never really got bored as I was playing the game – it always had my piqued attention. The game had it’s flaws, and multiplayer overall doesn’t seem as in-depth as Resistance 2 … which unfortunately means that this game can be cleared with a rental.

But, because the overall presentation of the game was so unique and well-done to me, that I may consider buying this once I have $60 to spend.

I also wanted to note my new admiration towards Naughty Dog. During the credits, it’s revealed that they give special thanks to many other game companies – including an almost 360-exclusive Bungie Studios. I’m also impressed that they are very public about how to properly code for the PS3’s Cell Processor. Many companies may keep this secret to themselves and capitalize on it to make great games. Whether you’re a fan of ND’s games or not, you have to admire them for the help they offer to other game companies who work with the PS3.

Review: Batman: Arkham Asylum

Ah, Batman. I’ve always been a Batman fan. I enjoyed the first few movies and I really enjoyed the new series that were done by Christopher Nolan. Infact, I still think Health Ledger was absolutely phenomenal in The Dark Knight. I’ve always loved the fact that the character behind Batman wasn’t a superhero due to a step forward in evolution or a spider-bite. Batman – behind it all – is a normal guy, who just happens to be really smart, rich and has a toy for everything.

Having played the demo, I wasn’t terribly impressed. But much like inFamous – I found myself going back to the demo. Eventually, I bought it – since all copies were out at the local Blockbuster. Was it a mistake? Or is this game worth the $60? Here are the high points and the low points. In the end, it’s your call …

• The predator modes of the game worked great. Having a large number of choices for silent takedowns makes you feel like there’s not much you CAN’T do.
• The storyline is actually pretty long and will keep you busy for awhile. The riddler clues and inventory upgrades will cause some backtracking … but the world isn’t too big that it’s a major chore to go from place to place.
• The combat system works okay in storymode, but really excels in the challenge modes – making you keep an eye out for your next move to attempt to get a high score. Personally, no game has ever offered a challenge room that has me hooked as much as this game.
• Voice acting was well done, and many of the voices were the same voices that were in the cartoon series. Kudos to Rockstead/Eidos for making that happen.
• Enemies in Predators mode don’t always follow the same path once you’ve started taking down enemies – which prevents from you from developing a definite, intricate pattern to help you get the quickest time.

• The combat system forces you into a set of rules, but the enemies can bend/break them causing you to screw up and/or get hit when you really shouldn’t have.
• The game has too many combat areas and too little predator areas. Isn’t Batman supposed to take out his enemies quietly one-by-one? So why are there many instances where you just basically fly in and start taking them out? I hope if they create a sequel, we see man more predator rooms and less combat rooms.
• Some riddles are difficult to decipher unless you know what you’re looking for. If you played the game and solved the riddles, you’ll know what I’m talking about.

• This doesn’t count as a negative or positive, just wanted to point out that the third Scarecrow encounter really threw me for a loop.

Postive Points: 5 | Negative Points: 3 | Total Score: +2

Welcome to the world, PS3 Slim …

… we knew about you for months. But despite the fact that Sony can’t seem to hold big secrets to save their lives, Sony threw out a bunch of info that fans really wanted to hear – ultimately making Sony that much more of a competition to Nintendo and Microsoft. And considering this is a blog that is 95% geared towards PS3, I feel the need to comment on them and mention why I think Sony has just made themselves that much more of a formidable opponent.

• Price Cut to $300. It’s what people have been asking for for a long time – damn near a year I’d say at least. At first, I could understand why they stuck to the $400 price tag, but when they announced that production costs were down by around 60-70% that’s when I finally jumped ship and said that they need to do a price cut. And, they did. And they did it for both systems … so it looks like $300 is the common price for a PS3. This should silence everyone saying that they’re holding out on a PS3 because it was too expensive, considering they dropped the price by about 25%.
• PS3 Slim. The PlayStation 3 finally has it’s makeover. Personally, I prefer the bulkier original but lucky for me, I don’t have to buy this one. I am a bit envious of the less power consumption … but no matter, I’m not sure how much it would reduce my electric bill if I bought a Slim. But, people who complained that it was too ugly or bulky can’t complain anymore.
• Rumored 250GB PS3 Slim. Not even a day after it was announced, places like Joystiq PS3 and PlayStation Lifestyle caught glimpse of another PS3 Slim model that was submitted to the FCC(?) which mentioned that it would have a 250GB model. Now, while this will give people another reason to hold off on a PS3, it shows that Sony is slowly catching up to what Microsoft is already offering.
• Firmware 3.0. On top of the PS3 Slim, and price cut, we’re also getting an update to the XMB. The PlayStaton Store is now under the game and videos tab and will link directly to the appropriate sections. The background of the OS gets a little update and we get a new information board, trophy sorting, and a small update to our friends list. We also get a new little mini-bar on the top-right which will let us know how many friends are online (numberwise), the date, time, our avatar and a little blurb of news, like a ticker. Something that I’m looking forward to are Dynamic Themes. Where now you’d have a standard wallpaper – a dynamic theme will have an animated background. A neat update overall, but will probably leave people still complaining about no cross-game voice chat.

And finally, it looks like the PS3 Slim brands a new logo, in what looks like to be a rebranding of the product. Personally, I’m not the biggest fan of this because it’s inconsistent with the model I have, but it’s nice to see them actively working to improve their product in all senses.

Ultimately, this puts Microsoft in a bit of a bind. With the rumored 250 PS3 Slim and the price cut, the PS3 now has almost everything that the 360 offers but also has a BluRay drive on top of that. As for Nintendo, they will have to look into a price cut because, like my friend has said, you can buy a much more powerful system for $100 more.

I have to say, I’m pretty impressed with what Sony pulled off yesterday. Almost everything announced was stuff that people were asking for for a long time – Price Cut, PS3 Slim, Firmware 3.0 – and it really makes it look like Sony actively listens to the input.

Hopefully it works out in the end for them – although I guess we’ll have to wait until the reports come in to see if it did or not.

Review: Arkham Asylum Demo

Arkham Asylum was another game that was on my must-rent list. And honestly, I’d probably buy it if our finances hadn’t limited us. I was happy to see a demo of it on the PSN so decided to give it a shot. Not much more to say, so here we go.

• The graphics looked great – even for a 1GB demo. And if this is how it’s going to be in the game … then it’s looking to be a pretty game overall. It goes to show that people are starting to use the PS3 for it’s potential instead of just porting it.
• The fighting mechanics were enjoyable. I can definitely see that this game is going to have stealth elements to it and I’m a sucker for stealth games. (I’m still a big fan of Thief)
• The game looks to play heavily on his tools as well – the Batarang, using a zipline (or whatever it’s called) to go from platform to platform, or to string enemies up, gliding takedowns or silent drops. It gives fighting a non-linear feel to it – you can pick and choose on what you want to do.
• Demo was too short for me. Only about five fighting areas and that was it. I would have liked to have more to play – but ultimately, the point of a demo is to get you wanting more.
• Considering how much you were able to play – a 1GB+ download seemed a bit extreme. You could play more in Call of Duty: World at War and that had about the same file size as this demo.
• Something about Batman’s appearance bugs me. Maybe it’s the blocky face structure, or how the game looks when you’re running – but something just stands off to me.

Positive Points: 3 | Negative Points: 3 | Final Score: 0